The Parallel Parliament

by Glen Pearson

Tag: political ideology

“False Options” – Community Engagement Podcast (26)

Great citizens don’t latch out and grab onto rigid ideologies that bring on political warfare.  Great politicians don’t either.  No one party has all the truth.  Neither does any citizen, or group of citizens.  Yet as we become more impatient with the political structures of our land, we can often reflect the rigidity of hyper-partisan politics.  We must grow as citizens, and to do so will require humility and the admission that we have much to learn if we are to be effective.  Political professionals seek to introduce ideological certainty into politics.  Such things are false options and we require the on-the-ground sense of living and knowledge each citizen requires each day to live productive lives.

Just click the audio button below to listen to the five-minute podcast.

Haughty and Hungry

There was a time, not all that many years ago when Canada was a deeply respected world player, that the United Nations was the venue through which we applied our foreign policy. Unlike our neighbours to the south, who exhibited a certain scepticism toward the international organization, Canada would only sanction international actions once cleared through the Security Council. It was a pattern practiced by every prime minister, regardless of the party in power.

There were advantages to this approach. Such constraint taught us the effective nuances of diplomacy and foreign service and kept us from striking out unilaterally in ways that could disturb fragile peace networks around the world.

Certain vestiges of that approach remain, but our careful diplomacy has now been overrun by the ideology of the “Strong Man” revealed by the current Conservative regime as opposed to the intelligent team player among nations that we were once noted for. This was a big part of the reason why we couldn’t win a seat on the Security Council a short while ago and why Canadian diplomatic influence is on the wane globally.

So we shouldn’t be surprised when a special UN food envoy comes to Canada and is treated to a tongue-lashing by the Harper Conservatives. To be sure, it was unusual for the UN to send such a representative to an advanced democracy instead of the usual developed nations facing so many challenges worldwide. But then again something unusual is itself happening in Canada. In only a few years we have fallen from first place to sixth on the Human Development Index.

The envoy, Olivier De Schutter, came as a friend to remind us that we are slipping in our commitment to those who are hungry. In return, he was treated like a chump by a government that should have known better. Minister Jason Kenney loves to mix it up with this kind of stuff and replied that the UN would do better to head back to the developing world and do their preaching among the starving millions.

Except we do have starving millions in Canada. As Schutter reminded us, some three million of our own people are attempting to stave off hunger and poverty. Almost a million people head to food banks for assistance each month, and of those assisted over 40% are children. I know this stuff, having been a volunteer executive director for a large food bank for 25 years. There is nothing fake about this – it is the cold hard reality of a modern Canada more focused on fighter jets than fighting poverty, on super jails instead of sustainable affordable housing. In fact, if the Conservatives would target just one-half of the funds for the F-35 and the super jails to tackling hunger, the lack of access to food or housing would end not in a generation, but within a few years.

But no, we don’t do that as Canada anymore. We have a government that asks Canadians, not to compare their own standards with themselves, but with Bangladesh, Somalia or some other devastated place across the globe. This is either a sign of a duped people or an arrogant government. We have taken to castigating our historic friends instead of receiving the critique in good faith – as good friends do. By telling the UN to head back to places like Africa to tackle food security, the government implied in troubling terms that 600,000 children living in poverty is absolutely acceptable in Canada, or that we can easily live with wait times of almost a decade for people requiring affordable housing. We not only showed our friend the exit door, we locked in a cell with no key some three million Canadians held in the clutches of poverty.

Kenney should be careful what he wishes for. All Schutter has to do is visit all those developed nations where Canada once used to play a significant part in tackling poverty and see that we don’t nearly care as much about poverty elsewhere either. We froze aid, then we cut it deeper. It will only confirm what he already knows – we currently run the risk as a once compassionate country of selling our birthright – for oil, for international finance, for the financial elite, and for a dollar made from risk as opposed to hard work and innovation.

At the very time that the Harper government is failing the country’s low-income citizens, it is also attempting to curtail the actions of those charities seeking to address hunger as a seriously relevant issue. Do good work if you wish, they say, but be careful lest you be spotted criticizing the federal government for its lack of action. You could lose your charitable status. Not only have the Conservatives turned their back on the poor themselves, they are inhibiting the ability of those ministering to needy families to speak to effective and long-term solutions to poverty. So somebody else had to come in and remind us.

I was brought up in Calgary singing, “This land is your land, this land is my land.” No more. This is Stephen Harper’s land – all the vacuous, ideological, mean breadth of it – at least for some. There is only one way to make this land ours again and make something more fair out of it in the process – take it back. But that will involve actually growing irate at the way our own citizens are being treated, as well as our friends that we have worked with for decades. We stand haughty and hungry. How’s that for a once-honoured nation?

Game On

Yesterday I received a phone call from a CTV reporter in another part of the country – a friend from the old days. He said he wanted to pick my brains about the Ontario election because he had been reading my recent blogs and wondered if I really believed progressivism was alive and well in this country.

He was basing his argument on the belief that Canada is becoming more Conservative as the years pass, effectively isolating people like me in the process. I laughingly told him he had drunk too much Kool-aid.

Why had he arrived at such a simplistic conclusion? Didn’t Prince Edward Island just finish an election in which Liberals, under Robert Ghiz, were returned with a majority government? What about Manitoba, where the NDP were returned with another majority? Today is Ontario’s turn, but it’s unlikely the Progressive Conservatives under Tim Hudak  will win or form any kind of majority. Why? Because he isn’t a “progressive” Conservative at all, but a slash-and-burn retrofit from the Harris era.

Each party has its strengths and weaknesses, yet in reality it’s getting harder to detect a Conservative sweep across the country. In fact, it appears as though some voters, long dormant, are beginning to fight back against an ideology. The stirrings of a backlash are beginning to make themselves felt. Voters might not take to government or politicians much these days, but they detest even more those who would threaten to take away any remaining vestige of the public space from them. They are tired of a politics of constant attacks, especially when it’s the subtle kind that seeks to suppress voters, turn them into ideological partisans, or ignore their own personal needs altogether in pursuit of power.

The Conservative slant in this country has angled towards what Benjamin DeMott calls “junk politics.” It never demands fair play, a fighting chance for the middle class against corporatism, or the right to call together the various regions of the country. Heck, it’s now at the point where it doesn’t even demand that its political candidates show up for public debates, where they can be tested against other platforms and have their facts checked by media sources. It personalizes issues but never clarifies them. It pretends to fight for the little guy while at the same time rigging the game against him. It pretends to care about the poor while institutionalizing poverty. It finds it real strength in the anonymity of the corporate state and it is determined to prevail, regardless of the national decline.

This isn’t Progressive Conservatism I’m talking about, but its radical, right-wing cousin that is seeking to infiltrate the progressive ranks by introduce rampant ideology. Progressive Conservatives are waking up to this reality and soon enough there will be push back from within their own circles.

When others trumpet the rise of the Right or the inevitable slide towards Conservative ideology, they ignore completely what happened in PEI, Manitoba, or likely Ontario. But they can’t ignore what’s developing within their own cloistered circles. When a true Progressive Conservative like Alison Redford wins the leadership of her party in Alberta, a slow change is afoot. Radical Conservatism’s efforts to effectively dismantle the institutions of social democracy are flying into stiff winds in Canada as compared to the United States. There comes a point where if you continue to kill public institutions you effectively kill citizenship as well. It is too soon to tell whether this rise to progressivism is in fact strong enough to actually become a trend of strength. That will depend more on the desire of citizens than the appeal of political parties. But we have now been at it long enough to detect the feet of clay in the rampant desires of the radicals on the Right. We are in a state of flux, but at least as provinces like Ontario, Manitoba or PEI reveal, there is now a true fight for the heart of the citizen. That, at least, is progress.

Today, I head to the voting booth with my family to vote for a Liberal candidate and a provincial Liberal party that I feel is best positioned to protect my children and those who society has forgotten. You, too, will vote your conscience and for the party or candidate of your choice. But I suspect there will be a growing reticence to opt for an ideology that continues to undermine our public performance. Regardless of the result, it’s game on, and progressives across the land, including those from all political parties are no longer having to struggle so hard against the wind.

%d bloggers like this: