Darfur
April 4, 2008
Saturday, April 6, is the anniversary of the Rwandan genocide, which
claimed 800,000 lives in 100 days. In the wake of Rwanda, the world vowed 'never
again.' The atrocities occurring for the past five years in Darfur question the
world's commitment to that
Jaela Bernstien and Mike Hayes -- The Gazette
This Sunday will mark the 14th anniversary of the start of the Rwandan
genocide, an event of systematic murder that saw an estimated 800,000 people
die over a mere 100 days.
On March 14, Lieutenant-General Romeo
Dallaire came to Western to talk not only about the horrors he witnessed
during his time in Rwanda as head of the United Nations’ Peacekeeping Force,
but about the worst humanitarian conflict of the 21st Century — Darfur.
Ever since the conflict first gained international attention in 2003,
government action has been sluggish, a fact that can be attributed to a lack
of personal connection between Western societies and victims of violence,
according to Dallaire.
“[With natural disasters], your instinctive
reaction is, you know, ‘that could be me.’ And so you can personalize it,”
Dallaire said. But he emphasized the necessity of holding the same mindset
when it comes to violent conflict.
Students Taking Action Now: Darfur,
a student group created at Western, has spent the last several years bringing
Darfur to the forefront of public debate. However, the amount of change
overall appears small.
Many blamed this on apathy. Yoni Levitan,
executive director of STAND, called it psychic numbing: “Because people can’t
wrap their heads around it, they choose to almost ignore it.”
Leah
Meidinger, co-divestment vice-president for STAND Western, agreed: “They’re
humans like we are and we could be easily living in their situation. It’s
just the right thing to do.
“If you saw someone being killed in front
of you and you stepped aside and watched, you’re just as guilty as if you had
a knife in your own hand,” she explained.
Dallaire urged students to
bear witness to the atrocities.
“Gain a personal experience in the
field, come back, and let the people look in your eyes and [let them] be
convinced by that,” Dallaire emphasized. “It is not just sort of something
that you think is worthwhile. It’s something that you’ve committed yourself
to,” he concluded.
One of the main difficulties with the conflict in
Darfur is the inability to mount a united international response. Nations
cannot agree whether the government-sanctioned attacks on civilians truly
constitute genocide.
If the UN labeled the displacement and murder in
Darfur as genocide it would be forced to live up to the promises it made
under the UN Action Plan to Prevent Genocide laid out by former Secretary
General Kofi Annan in 2004. This has led to criticism, especially in light of
Annan’s statements regarding genocide while at the UN.
“If we are
serious about preventing or stopping genocide in the future, we must not be
held back by legalistic arguments about whether a particular atrocity meets
the definition of genocide or not,” Annan said in his 2004 speech announcing
the plan.
Several months after Annan’s announcement, Doctor Jean-Hervé
Bradol, president of the French division of Médecins Sans Frontières
explained in an interview the use of the term “genocide” can create
confusion.
“The situation is severe enough to be described for what it
is — a mass repression campaign against civilians,” Bradol said.
“And
we should say ‘pro-government militias’ not ‘Arab militias’” Bradol
continued. “The social and tribal reality in Sudan is far more complex than
such a simplification.”
MSF has not recognized the Darfur conflict as
genocide, though it has maintained a heavy involvement in humanitarian
efforts, providing health facilities for approximately 500,000 displaced
people.
Naomi Sutorius, MSF Canada’s press officer, said, “MSF’s
position is that the events taking place in Darfur are of such grave and
serious magnitude as to warrant the world’s full attention and reaction,
irrespective of whether or not one chooses to put a ‘genocide’ label on it.”
Levitan agreed: “Whether or not it’s genocide, the same number of people
have been killed, the same number of villages have been burned.”
Glen
Pearson, MP for London North Centre, agreed the use of the word genocide is
not important when it comes to action at the individual level.
“If my
kids [had] died in Darfur, it wouldn’t have mattered if it was a genocide or
not,” Pearson argued.
On his recent visit to Sudan, Levitan met a
woman who fled home when the pro-government militia attacked her village.
Her husband was killed and she was forced to leave several of her
children behind.
Levitan recalled, “She has almost no way of ever
finding out what happened to her children. It’s something that’s going to
weigh on her for the rest of her life.”
Although there is risk of
dying from starvation or lack of shelter, civilians are constantly fleeing to
the south of Sudan where they can at least escape the violent oppression of
the Janjaweed militia.
But the already horrendous conditions for
internally displaced persons are likely to worsen as the threat of a new
clash between the north and south is continually growing.
“They’re
going to have nowhere to go really,” Levitan explained. “It’s going to lead
to more deaths and more people living in crowded camps in even worst
conditions than they are in the moment.”
Pearson and his wife have
been volunteering in south Sudan for 10 years and have adopted three kids
from the war-torn country.
According to Pearson, groups like STAND
can be very persuasive. That’s why he opened his office to the student group
this summer for three months, allowing them to use resources not normally
available to them.
Pearson said STAND’s efforts are beginning to have
an effect in Ottawa. In fact, a new private member’s bill was recently
brought forth in parliament asking for the complete divestment from Iran and
Sudan.
Levitan thought the motion was a step in the right direction.
“It shows it’s becoming a higher profile issue on Parliament Hill.
“A big piece of the puzzle that has been missing is the people that are
in positions of leadership, both in public and private sector,” he explained.